question.
3.17.2008
has the sporting news ALWAYS been this full of shit? what does "action is always better than inaction, even if it ends up making the franchise look dumb somewhere down the line" even mean? and why do some sportswriters think thatwriting like this is a good idea. you are not ernest hemingway.
you are not even margaux hemingway.
i think that they should write like this.
like a concrete poem. that would be better.
more people might read. all the way. til the end.
Labels: douchebags




